Starmer’s Chagos deal dealt major blow as judge rules Chagossians have right to live on disputed islands

Justice James Lewis, the judge for the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) Court, has ruled that Chagossians have a right of abode on the islands

Starmer’s Chagos deal dealt major blow as judge rules Chagossians have right to live on disputed islands
Starmer’s Chagos deal dealt major blow as judge rules Chagossians have right to live on disputed islands Photo: The Independent

Justice James Lewis, the judge for the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) Court, has ruled that Chagossians have a right of abode on the islands
Keir Starmer’s deal to hand over the Chagos Islands to Mauritius has been dealt another major blow after a court ruling gave islanders expelled in the 1960s the right to live there.

The landmark ruling is a further blow to the beleaguered prime minister, whose efforts to resolve the future of the Chagos Islands, which houses the crucial US-UK airbase on Diego Garcia, has undone almost six decades of previous legal judgements on the islands.

The deal was already in trouble because of opposition from Donald Trump after a row over whether the US could use the airbase for attacks on Iran , the judgment by Justice James Lewis, the judge for the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) Court, could finish off the deal altogether.

One of them, Louis Misley Mandarin, who said he was elected first minister of the Chagossian government-in-exile last December, told the court: “We are Chagossians...

We have long wanted to return, and we had sought permits to visit, but no oneanswered us, so we have come here to prove we would still like to return.”
In his judgement, Justice Lewis has overturned the 2004 law for the islands brought in by Tony Blair’s government to prevent a return to the islands by Chagossians.

He has also reversed previous rulings by the Law Lords on their original removal in the 1960s and 1970s.

He concluded that the government’s previous case that there could not be a return to the islands on national security or defence grounds no longer applies because the proposed deal with Mauritius means that the government now accepts the islands can be populated.

He also stated that the cost to the UK taxpayer of the Mauritius deal, which he estimates to be £51bn – higher than any other previous estimate – means that the argument that it is too costly to enable Chagossians to return has also been invalidated.

The government has already lodged an appeal against the judgment, which has been granted and will be heard by the BIOT Court of Appeal.

The original decision to negotiate a deal with Mauritius came from a ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which was not binding on the UK, but stated that the islands belonged to Mauritius.

However, this ruling was based on Mauritius being the former colonial administration centre for the islands.

Other parts of the British Empire that had been administered from Mauritius gained independence because they were populated.

James Tumbridge, the lawyer acting for the Chagossians, has told The Independent : “Once a population is established on the islands, it changes the entire legal status and means that they should be looked at as their own entity.”
The return to the islands came in an expedition funded by Reform’s biggest donor, Christopher Harborne and led by former Tory MP and Reform defector Adam Holloway.

But in his ruling, Justice Lewis appears to be critical of Nigel Farage and others from Reform, specifically stating that they do not have the right to go to the islands.

Mr Farage had tried to join the four Chagossians last month.

In response to the court’s ruling Mr Mandarin said: "Today justice has finally begun to catch up with history.

For generations we have lived with exile, with loss, and with the denial of our most basic rights.

This judgment restores not just a legal principle, but our dignity as a people.

Mr Tumbridge added: "This judgment shows justice works when people are given the chance to be heard.

The decision to forcibly remove British subjects from British land, for the Crown to take away the right of abode, should never have been allowed.

Today we can start to right that wrong."
It is hard to overstate the importance of this moment.

The government's entire approach to Chagos, built over more than twenty years, has been fundamentally called into question."
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Source: This article was originally published by The Independent

Read Full Original Article →

Share this article

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Leave a Comment

Maximum 2000 characters