Tennessee grandmother wrongly jailed for six months, latest victim of AI

Angela Lipps spent nearly six months behind bars after AI software misidentified her.

She's at least the ninth American it's happened to.

(Image credit: Matt Henson / WDAY)
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

A Tennessee grandmother spent nearly six months in jail after police in Fargo, North Dakota, used facial recognition software to identify her as the primary suspect in a bank fraud case, according to reporting by WDAY News .

The problem was that Angela Lipps, 50, had never been to North Dakota, and bank records confirmed she was more than 1,200 miles away at the time of the alleged crimes.

Her case is the latest in a documented pattern of wrongful arrests driven by facial recognition technology deployed without adequate investigative follow-up.

Fargo police were investigating a series of bank fraud incidents in April and May last year, in which a woman used a fake U.S.

Army ID to withdraw tens of thousands of dollars.

Detectives ran surveillance footage through facial recognition software, which returned a match to Lipps.

A detective then compared her Tennessee driver's license and social media images to the suspect and concluded that she was the perpetrator based on facial features, body type, and hair.

Nobody from the department contacted Lipps before U.S.

Marshals arrested her at gunpoint on July 14 while she was babysitting four children.

Shockingly, this is just the latest in a series of structural failures that have led to innocent people being persecuted for crimes they didn’t commit.

A January 2025 WaPo investigation documented at least eight instances of Americans wrongfully arrested after police found a possible FRT match, and in every case, investigators skipped fundamental steps like checking alibis and comparing physical descriptions that would have cleared the suspect before arrest.

The facial recognition vendors themselves, such as Clearview AI, even attach explicit caveats to their systems .

Clearview requires agencies to acknowledge that results "are indicative and not definitive" and that officers must conduct further research before acting on them.

According to an April 2024 ACLU submission to the U.S.

Commission on Civil Rights, in at least five of seven wrongful arrest cases, police had received explicit warnings that FRT results don’t constitute probable cause but made arrests anyway.

Robert Williams, whose 2020 wrongful arrest in Detroit was the first publicly reported FRT false-positive case, reached a landmark settlement with the city in June 2024 that now requires independent corroborating evidence before any FRT match can be used to seek an arrest warrant.

However, only 15 states had enacted any FRT legislation covering law enforcement at the start of 2025, and North Dakota is not among them.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News , or add us as a preferred source , to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.

Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory.

Ralston18 said: However, the real problem is the breakdown of the judicial system and the lack of "common sense" overall.

But find someone old, poor, defenseless, etc.

- you can see what happens.

The judicial system, the police, and likely bureacratic others, made the situation worse, and put it on a path to get even worse.

As what happened.

Others need to be held accountable as well.

PEnns said: Unbelievable!!

This woman needs some bad a$$ lawyer and sue the heck out of everybody involved: The Facial rec.

company, the bank and the police.

And the horses they rode on too!!

DougMcC said: This is how you solve this problem.

Get her a multimillion dollar judgement and Fargo will be thinking twice about the value their facial recognition software is bringing them.