Starmer resists calls to resign as he sacks Foreign Office chief after Mandelson vetting scandal explodes

Security officials initially denied Lord Mandelson clearance - but Foreign Office officials overruled the recommendation

Starmer resists calls to resign as he sacks Foreign Office chief after Mandelson vetting scandal explodes
Starmer resists calls to resign as he sacks Foreign Office chief after Mandelson vetting scandal explodes Photo: Evening Standard

Sir Keir Starmer is not going to resign, a Cabinet minister said, after he axed the head of the Foreign Office in the Mandelson scandal which was threatening to end his premiership.

Sir Olly Robbins is leaving his post after it emerged the department overruled a security vetting process to clear Lord Peter Mandelson to become UK ambassador to the US despite his links to paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein.

Sir Keir was said by No10 to be “absolutely furious” and has lost confidence in the Foreign Office’s permanent under-secretary.

But senior MPs questioned whether the Foreign Office’s top civil servant would have acted alone, and without political guidance on such a crucial issue.

Darren Jones, Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister, said Sir Keir was not going to resign and denied that he had misled Parliament over the Mandelson scandal by saying full due process had been followed including over vetting.

The Cabinet minister said the PM was "furious with the state" because the Foreign Office was able to overrule the vetting process for Lord Mandelson.

He accepted that the peer would have been able to see secret documents despite having initially failed security clearance.

Mr Jones said he had ordered an urgent review after discovering that the Foreign Office and other Government departments had the right to ignore security advice when appointing people to sensitive roles.

He told Sky News: "It is utterly unacceptable, not just in the individual case of Peter Mandelson and respect of the Prime Minister's fury at the Foreign Office for not having taught him this information, but the very fact that their processes were in place that allow for that to happen in the first place.

"That's why in my role in the Cabinet Office, immediately last night, I suspended the rights for these organisations to make these judgments.

"I've asked for an urgent review about what decisions these organisations have taken in the past to overrule the recommendations from UK security vetting, and I was due to announce a broader, independent review of the vetting process anyway.

And this will now be part of that."
‘Unacceptable’ to overrule Mandelson vetting recommendation – Darren Jones
Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron to host Paris talks on opening Strait of Hormuz
Top Foreign Office civil servant to leave post after Starmer loses confidence
Rediscover your adventurous side on an exotic getaway
Asked on BBC Breakfast whether the Prime Minister was going to resign, and whether he has either knowingly or unknowingly misled Parliament, Mr Jones responded "no".

But Dame Emily Thornberry, chair of the Commons foreign affairs committee, challenged the idea that Sir Olly acted alone.

She said: “The question is was it Olly Robbins who was a senior civil servant who had only been in the post a couple of weeks and who is going to say ‘this political appointment, they failed their security vetting, I’m going to decide all by myself that I’m going to override this and have him appointed anyway’.

“Or was he being pushed by someone else?”
He told LBC: "None of this adds up, the idea they weren't told about the vetting.

Remember, in the House of Commons, Starmer actually said that the vetting had told him about the ongoing relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, then outside of the House, in Hastings, he gave a speech in which he said that Mandelson had cleared security vetting.

Security officials initially denied Lord Mandelson clearance, but Foreign Office officials took the rare step of overruling the recommendation .

The Government says Sir Keir was not aware that the former Labour grandee was granted developed vetting against the advice of UK Security Vetting until earlier this week.

He has instructed officials to establish the facts about why vetting was granted, and the Foreign Office earlier said it is “working urgently” to comply.

Sir Keir will make a statement in the Commons on Monday over the matter.

He is due to face the media on Friday alongside French President Emmanuel Macron as he co-hosts a summit on reopening the Strait of Hormuz in Paris, with the pair expected to make a joint statement in the afternoon.

David Lammy, who was Foreign Secretary when Lord Mandelson was appointed, also did not know the Foreign Office had overruled the vetting until Thursday afternoon, it is understood.

A Government spokesperson confirmed that “officials in the FCDO” had taken the decision to grant developed vetting against the recommendation.

The Prime Minister has faced calls to stand down over the matter, with Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch calling it “preposterous” to claim he did not know Lord Mandelson failed security vetting.

She said: “If the Prime Minister doesn’t know what’s happening in his own office, he shouldn’t be in charge of our country.

He should go.”
Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said Sir Keir should have told Parliament “at the earliest opportunity” when he learned what had happened earlier this week, rather than having “waited for the media to force the truth out”.

The Green Party and Reform UK have also called for Sir Keir to resign.

Lord Mandelson, a political appointment rather than a career diplomat, was sacked from his Washington role last September when more details emerged about his relationship with Epstein, who died in 2019.

Sir Keir has been under fire over the decision to give Lord Mandelson the job despite it being known that his dealings with Epstein continued after the financier’s conviction for child sex offences.

Questions over his judgment intensified after the first batch of documents related to the decision published last month showed that he was warned before announcing Lord Mandelson’s ambassadorship of a “general reputational risk” over his association with Epstein.

That warning stemmed from the first part of the checks, carried out by the Cabinet Office, which was based on information in the public domain at the time.

The second was the highly confidential background vetting by security officials, which followed the announcement but came before Lord Mandelson took up his role in February 2025.

More documents relating to his appointment are yet to be released at the behest of MPs.

Sir Keir said in February that Lord Mandelson was cleared by security vetting, which he criticised for failing to disprove the former Labour grandee’s lies.

When Morgan McSweeney stepped down as Sir Keir’s chief of staff in February , he took “full responsibility” for giving his boss advice that resulted in the “wrong” appointment decision, while also calling for the vetting process to be “fundamentally overhauled”.

Source: This article was originally published by Evening Standard

Read Full Original Article →

Share this article

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Leave a Comment

Maximum 2000 characters